Qwen 2.5 vs Llama 3: The East vs West AI Battle
TL;DR
Qwen 2.5 is the surprising challenger that beats Llama 3 on coding and mathematics benchmarks. However, Llama 3 retains the edge in English creative writing and safety ecosystem.
Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Qwen 2.5 (Alibaba) | Llama 3 (Meta) |
|---|---|---|
| Origin | China (Alibaba) | USA (Meta) |
| Coding Score | 88.4 (HumanEval) | 82.0 (HumanEval) |
| Context Window | 128k | 8k / 128k |
| License | Apache 2.0 | Llama Community |
Qwen 2.5 (Alibaba)
Pros
- ✅ Incredible math/code performance
- ✅ Truly open license (Apache 2.0)
- ✅ Strong multilingual
Cons
- ❌ Heavier censorship on political topics
- ❌ Less Western documentation
- ❌ Nuance in English fiction
Llama 3 (Meta)
Pros
- ✅ Standard for US Enterprise
- ✅ Huge fine-tuning ecosystem
- ✅ Better safety guardrails
Cons
- ❌ Weaker at complex logic
- ❌ Restrictive license for giants
- ❌ Slower innovation cycle
Verdict
Qwen 2.5 is the surprising challenger that beats Llama 3 on coding and mathematics benchmarks. However, Llama 3 retains the edge in English creative writing and safety ecosystem.
Last updated: February 2026
💬 Comments
Comments are coming soon! We're setting up our discussion system.
In the meantime, feel free to contact us with your feedback.