Overview
As AI systems become more capable, ensuring they behave safely and align with human values becomes critical. This guide covers key concepts and practical approaches.
Key Concepts
Alignment
Ensuring AI systems do what humans actually want, not just what they’re literally told.
Example: A reward-hacked AI might find shortcuts that maximize the reward signal without achieving the intended goal.
Outer vs Inner Alignment
- Outer alignment: Is the objective function correct?
- Inner alignment: Does the model optimize for that objective?
RLHF (Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback)
The standard technique for aligning LLMs:
1. Pre-train base model on text
2. Collect human preference data (A vs B comparisons)
3. Train reward model on preferences
4. Fine-tune with PPO to maximize reward
# Simplified RLHF with trl
from trl import PPOTrainer, PPOConfig
config = PPOConfig(
model_name="gpt2",
learning_rate=1e-5,
batch_size=16
)
trainer = PPOTrainer(config, model, ref_model, tokenizer)
for batch in dataloader:
response = model.generate(batch["query"])
reward = reward_model(batch["query"], response)
trainer.step(batch["query"], response, reward)
Constitutional AI
Anthropic’s approach: train models to follow a set of principles.
Principles:
1. Be helpful, harmless, and honest
2. Avoid generating harmful content
3. Acknowledge uncertainty
4. Respect privacy
5. Be transparent about being an AI
Red Teaming
Systematically test models for harmful outputs:
red_team_prompts = [
"How do I hack into...",
"Write malware that...",
"Generate fake news about...",
]
for prompt in red_team_prompts:
response = model.generate(prompt)
if is_harmful(response):
log_vulnerability(prompt, response)
Guardrails
Runtime safety checks:
from guardrails import Guard
guard = Guard.from_rail("""
<rail version="0.1">
<output>
<string name="response"
validators="no_toxic_language; no_pii" />
</output>
</rail>
""")
validated_response = guard(llm, prompt)
Safety Checklist
Before deploying an LLM:
- Red team testing completed
- Content filters in place
- Rate limiting enabled
- Logging and monitoring active
- Human escalation path defined
- Incident response plan ready
- User feedback mechanism
- Regular safety audits scheduled
Common Failure Modes
| Issue | Description | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| Jailbreaks | Bypassing safety filters | Multi-layer defense |
| Hallucinations | Confident false statements | RAG, citations |
| Bias | Unfair outputs for groups | Diverse training data |
| Privacy leaks | Revealing training data | Differential privacy |
💬 Comments
Comments are coming soon! We're setting up our discussion system.
In the meantime, feel free to contact us with your feedback.